Series: Church, Faith, and the Bible
Think of the depictions of Jesus that you’ve seen. Let’s for a moment ignore the fact that there’s a 98% chance that he looks European. Does he have a beard? That’s more like 50/50. It’s likely though that as a Jewish man living in the Holy Land, that he probably had a beard. Why then did Christians judge people in the 60s who had long hair and a beard as being “unchristian”?
It comes down to a pair of great seminary words: exegesis and eisegesis. Exegesis is the process of going to the Bible and reading it to try to determine what it’s saying. This isn’t an easy process. After all, it was written in a couple of dead languages by a bunch of authors two thousand years ago and over the course of hundreds of years.
Exegesis is hard. You have to consider language, history, the unknown intent of the author, and the context of all the other things the Bible says over its many many many pages. It makes it hard to say things like “the Bible clearly says…” You end up having to say uncomfortable things like “given the historical context and the audience to which the letter is written, I find it likely that. . . .” It just doesn’t play well in an argument with someone holding a sign and a megaphone on a street corner or with your fundamentalist uncle over Thanksgiving turkey.
Now let’s talk about eisegesis. Eisegesis is the reverse of exegesis. In any good seminary, it’s taught as a logical fallacy to be avoided at all costs. It’s something that everyone who has ever talked about the Bible (including me) has done. Eisegesis is when you take your opinion to the Bible, and find a couple of texts to justify what you already believe. It takes the Bible not in context, but in isolation. It’s incredible how good eisegesis looks on hand drawn signs and sounds shouted from megaphones! It lets you say things like “The Bible clearly says…” and “I’m just reading the Bible, I don’t need your intellectual trickery,” it lets you put a single scripture reference behind a phrase like “God hates _____” and treat that single verse like proof.
But, it’s wrong. It’s a logical fallacy. It’s like arguing something is right because “that’s what I think.” It’s treating opinion as proof. Let’s think about just a few of the things that Christians have felt that “the Bible clearly said:”
- Slavery is a good thing
- North America has been given to white Europeans
- There is only one position in which you can have sex
- People are poor because they are lazy
- God wants you to go to X land and kill Y people
- Opposing the Church is punishable by death
- The king is God’s presence on earth
- Any and all sex is inherently sinful
- Alcohol should be outlawed
- You’ll go to hell if you have tattoos, long hair, or facial hair
- Women wear dresses and men wear pants (not many people even had pants in the time of the Bible)
- Science is worthless
- Women belong in the home
- God opposes communism (and loves capitalism)
- Sex which can’t result in pregnancy is wrong
- God hates gays
- America is God’s chosen country (find me America in the Bible)
- Drag shows are a threat to society
Each of these has been, and often still is, justified with an appeal to scripture and a nice, tidy, isolated scripture or set of scriptures. If you disagree, you must be wrong, and maybe evil, because “the Bible clearly says. …”
If you’ve been burned by people telling you what “the Bible clearly says,” you don’t have to take their word for it, or mine either. Explore it for yourself, and if you’d like some guidance on where to start and how to understand this strange but amazing book, we would love to help. Check out our spiritual direction services.